Advertisement

Bred for looks - born to suffer ! RSPCA latest Campaign !

http://www.rspca.org.uk/getinvolved/campaigns/companion/borntosuffer
The way that dogs are bred today, in order to win shows, is having a huge impact on their health and welfare. This is why we’ve launched our Born to suffer campaign which seeks an end to the breeding of dogs based on looks.

But it´s not just show dogs that may be suffering. Many pedigree dogs never appear in shows, but many are bred by breeders who want to produce show-winning animals, and who sell their surplus dogs as pets.
Scientific evidence
According to scientific studies some of the UK´s favourite breeds of dogs have been bred to such extremes that they can no longer breathe or walk normally. For example, dogs with short, flat faces often have narrow nostrils and abnormally developed windpipes. They can often suffer severe breathing difficulties and may have difficulty enjoying a walk or playing. Dogs with folded or wrinkled skin are prone to itchy and painful skin complaints, and dogs with bulging or sunken eyes are prone to injury, pain or discomfort.
These are only a few examples and a recent study showed that all of the 50 most popular breeds have some aspect of their body which can cause suffering.
.........................
Owners of fashionable pedigree pooches are unaware their ´handbag dogs´ could be ´born to suffer´, the RSPCA has said.
Research by the animal charity revealed many people believe pedigree dogs and puppies are healthy, quality animals that come from good breeding stock.
However, the dogs, who are primarily bred for their looks, are vulnerable to unnecessary disease, disability, pain or behavioural problems.

Warning: The RSCPA has said that many owners of pedigree dogs are unaware their dogs, who are born for their looks, are vulnerable to unnecessary disease, disability, pain or behavioural problems
RSPCA senior scientist Claire Calder said: ´Everyone needs to be aware of the serious health and welfare problems affecting pedigree dogs and that dogs bred for looks are born to suffer.
´A cute-looking puppy or dog can be hard to resist, but the result of not looking beyond this can be thousands of pounds spent on vets´ bills and a pet with long-lasting health and welfare problems. This is one of the biggest challenges facing dog welfare in the UK today.´
A survey commissioned by the charity found dog buyers are not doing enough research before getting a new pet.

Pollsters asked 2,127 people what they associate with pure-breed or pedigree dogs.
The top six responses were expense, well bred, from good breeding stock, quality, responsibly bred and healthy.
Victoria Stilwell, presenter and dog trainer from the TV show It´s Me Or The Dog, said: ´I have nothing against dog showing and nothing against responsible breeders.
Angry: Victoria Stilwell says she has something against people who breed animals just for the way they look
Angry: Victoria Stilwell says she has something against people who breed animals just for the way they look
´But what I do have something against is breeding animals just for the way we want them to look, even though that animal is compromised both physically and, a lot of the time, mentally.
´So we have to change. Why are we destroying these animals just because we like the way they look?´

The RSPCA is launching a campaign, Bred For Looks, Born To Suffer, in order to raise awareness of the issue.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2075891/Handbag-dogs-bred-looks-born-suffer-says-RSPCA.html#ixzz1gzggKvyt
From the topic:
Comments
Post a comment in this discussion:
23 Dec 2011 08:43
I am soooo sick and tired of the RSPCA. Here they go again setting up a campaign designed to grab headlines and get them the publicity they seem to crave. I agree that some pedigree dogs do have serious health issues caused by breeders continuously breeding to exaggerate a dog´s characteristics. The pug is an obvious example, but I walk a basset hound twice a week and he suffers from bouts of lameness which is caused by the appalling conformation of his legs. In my humble opinion, his breeder ought to be ashamed of themselves.
However, I do think this campaign by the RSPCA is poorly thought out and doesn´t do anything to educate the general public about the health, welfare of pedigree dogs, and how to go about obtaining a dog from a reputable, responsible breeder. If the RSPCA encouraged people to only buy puppies from breeders who health test their dogs, this would go some way to improving matters. The RSPCA and the KC need to work together on this one, and as we´ve discussed on PS many times before, the KC needs to stop registering puppies indiscriminantly and only register those from health tested breeding stock.
I would think more of the RSPCA if they did what most of us think is their main job and go out and help animals in distress when people call in to report an animal in distress. On another forum, I´ve been reading about a poor staffie girl who has been abused for years and has finally been killed by her owner. Another family member had reported the dog´s situation on more than one occasion, but the RSPCA wouldn´t help, and poor Maizie has now lost her life.
If the RSPCA want to start a new campaign why don´t they publicise the problem of puppy farms and campaign/start a petition to get them closed?
22 Dec 2011 00:38
I really pity those breeds of dogs that are the usual targets for fashion people and they take their dogs as an accessory to accent their outfit or style. I am not against dog grooming but sometimes, things go a little over the top with what they do.

It is awfully hard to stay in a shoulder bag as well and for a dog to take the type of thing, I am pretty sure that they would not be that appreciative of it.
19 Dec 2011 21:25
Vena I understand its all pedigree dogs, but after seeing the TV show tiny pets & watching that awful BBC programme about Cavalier King Charles, we have to say NO to playing GOD on all dogs but we do have to start somewhere, whether its with the toy, small, medium, large or designer dogs we need to start soon or certain breeds will be wiped out foe good.
19 Dec 2011 18:30
Tina the campaign is for pedigree show dogs not just ´handbag dogs.
Quote: The way that dogs are bred today, in order to win shows, is having a huge impact on their health and welfare no shades of grey there then - no use of the word ´some´ or a few´ or ´a small number´ - nope thats ALL pedigree dogs words fail me.
There is no doubt that some breeds do need to be looked into but making a sweeping statement to infer that ALL P.D. suffer disease, disability, pain or behavioural problems ) is outrages,what an insult to all those responsible breeders who do all health checks and really care for their dogs , many purebred dogs never appear in shows especially the ones by BYB and PF, .
What they really want is an end to pedigree dogs and dog showing ´full stop´ but in affect what they are doing is promoting P.F. and BYB.

19 Dec 2011 17:37
As you are aware I own 6 lovely JRT´s (Parson Terriers) they are not the pudding type or mini type, they are in fact the size of the original size JRT/Parson Terrier (except one who thinks he´s a Great Dane lol) seriously why do humans think they can act as GOD & alter the looks, weight & height of these dogs.
We humans are not GOD & therefore we should not be messing around by mix breeding in order to make "handbag" & "designer" dogs.